A new research report is raising fresh questions about the sustainability of yield in DeFi, as capital shifts away from token emission-driven returns toward on-chain fixed income products backed by real-world assets.
The report examines the structure behind emerging “RealFi” products, focusing on how platforms are attempting to replace speculative yield models with income derived from traditional financial instruments such as credit and government debt.
The Ultimate Trial of On-Chain Fixed Income: Are You Buying Real Yield or a Ponzi Countdown?
As the high-yield myths of DeFi shatter one after another, billions in capital are frantically searching for a true safe haven. But are on-chain fixed-income products and RWA Vaults… pic.twitter.com/vdSzTv6nAT
— Pharos Research (@PharosResearch_) April 16, 2026
Why are tokenized real-world assets growing rapidly in 2026?
Tokenized real world assets are rapidly growing in 2026, with market value rising to about $23.6 billion as institutions move on-chain to access stable, real-world yields.
Growth is being driven mainly by tokenized US Treasuries and increasing institutional adoption, with benefits like steady returns, 24/7 settlement, and broader access to assets such as credit, commodities, and equities.
Shift from token rewards to real-world yield
According to the findings, the collapse of high APY models powered by token incentives has forced the market to rethink how yield is generated. Investors are increasingly demanding transparency around underlying cash flows rather than relying on inflationary reward mechanisms.
One model highlighted uses a dual allocation strategy, splitting capital between higher-yield credit exposure and lower-risk government securities. In this structure, roughly 70% is directed toward structured consumer credit to capture yield, while 30% is allocated to short-duration U.S. Treasuries to provide liquidity and downside protection.
The report also points to a growing shift toward net asset value-based pricing, where returns are reflected directly in asset value rather than distributed as separate rewards. This mirrors traditional asset management practices and signals a move away from DeFi’s earlier incentive-driven frameworks.
Liquidity controls and institutional risk frameworks
The study also addresses concerns around liquidity restrictions, particularly pre-deposit lockups that limit immediate withdrawals. While often criticized, these mechanisms are designed to align investor redemptions with the cash flow cycles of underlying assets, reducing the risk of sudden liquidity crises.
Risk management remains a key focus, with emphasis on off-chain safeguards including audits, custody arrangements, and legal ownership structures. These layers are intended to provide additional protection beyond on-chain mechanisms, especially during market stress.
Meanwhile, PHAROS Research released a report examining the role of foundations in crypto project governance, highlighting how these entities can become central points of influence in otherwise decentralized networks.
Enjoyed this piece? Bookmark DeFi Planet, explore related topics, and follow us on Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, Threads and CoinMarketCap Community for seamless access to high-quality industry insights.
Take control of your crypto portfolio with DEFI PLANET PRO, DeFi Planet’s suite of analytics tools.
