In a filing submitted on July 30, the SEC responded to the court’s minute order by seeking to amend its complaint related to “Third Party Crypto Asset Securities.” The agency stated that this amendment negates the need for a judicial ruling on the classification of these tokens at this time.
According to the SEC, this amendment eliminates the need for the court to rule on the adequacy of the allegations regarding these tokens at this time. Consequently, the agency is no longer seeking a court decision on whether the tokens in question are considered securities.
In its original lawsuit, the SEC had argued that several tokens, including Binance Coin (BNB), Binance USD (BUSD), Solana (SOL), Cardano (ADA), Polygon (MATIC), Cosmos (ATOM), The Sandbox (SAND), Decentraland (MANA), Axie Infinity (AXS), and Coti (COTI), were securities. The SEC’s broader stance, asserted in June 2023, identified at least 68 tokens as securities, impacting over $100 billion worth of cryptocurrencies in the market.
The recent filing suggests a change in the SEC’s approach, as it no longer seeks immediate judicial determination on these tokens’ status.
Attorneys claim SEC is overstepping
The SEC’s retraction of its request for a ruling follows a challenge from Iowa’s Attorney General, Brenna Bird. On July 22, 2024, Bird, supported by attorneys general from Arkansas, Indiana, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, and Oklahoma, filed an amicus brief asserting that the SEC is overstepping its regulatory authority in the cryptocurrency sector. The brief argues that the SEC’s enforcement actions are stifling innovation and could undermine state laws designed to protect consumers.
It raises constitutional concerns under the Major Questions Doctrine and federalism, contending that regulation of the cryptocurrency industry requires explicit congressional authorization, which they argue the SEC lacks. Additionally, the brief claims that the SEC’s approach violates the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) by regulating through enforcement rather than a proper legislative framework.
Read Also: Binance Review 2022: What Are the Pros and Cons of Binance?
What it means for SOL, ADA and MATIC
For Solana and Cardano in particular, the change provides greater regulatory clarity than existed when the SEC first named the tokens in its Binance complaint.
SOL and ADA were among the assets that faced uncertainty after being identified by the SEC in litigation against Binance and other exchanges. The 2026 SEC-CFTC framework now provides a much clearer federal regulatory interpretation for those assets.
MATIC presents a slightly different case because Polygon migrated from MATIC to POL as part of its network upgrade. As a result, the regulatory discussion around Polygon’s ecosystem now involves POL as the network’s primary token rather than simply the MATIC asset named in the older SEC complaint.
The broader significance is that major blockchain networks are increasingly being evaluated within a regulatory framework that distinguishes the underlying digital asset from specific transactions and activities involving it.
Enjoyed this? Bookmark DeFi Planet, explore related topics, and follow us on Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, Threads, and CoinMarketCap Community for seamless access to high-quality industry insights
Take control of your crypto portfolio with DEFI PLANET PRO, DeFi Planet’s suite of analytics tools.
