• About Us
  • Careers
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
Thursday, July 24, 2025
DeFi Planet
  • News
    • People
    • Business
    • Crime
    • Regulation
    • Crypto
    • CBDC
  • Markets
    • Bitcoin
    • Ethereum
    • Stablecoins
    • Altcoins
    • Crypto ETFs
    • Memecoins
  • Policy
  • Articles
    • Press Releases
    • Opinion
    • Explainers
    • Guest Post
    • Sponsored
  • Directory
    • Companies
    • People
    • Products
    • Wallets
  • Multimedia
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
  • Learn
    • DeFi Basics
    • Tutorials
    • Reviews
    • Blockchain Fundamentals
  • Research
    • Case Studies
  • Explore
    • DeFi
    • Crypto Gaming
    • NFT
    • DAO
    • Metaverses
    • Glossary
  • Jobs
  • Markets Pro
    • DeFi Planet Pro
    • Spend Crypto
    • Swap Crypto
    • Coin Prices
    • Crypto Exchanges
    • Crypto Analyzer
  • News
    • People
    • Business
    • Crime
    • Regulation
    • Crypto
    • CBDC
  • Markets
    • Bitcoin
    • Ethereum
    • Stablecoins
    • Altcoins
    • Crypto ETFs
    • Memecoins
  • Policy
  • Articles
    • Press Releases
    • Opinion
    • Explainers
    • Guest Post
    • Sponsored
  • Directory
    • Companies
    • People
    • Products
    • Wallets
  • Multimedia
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
  • Learn
    • DeFi Basics
    • Tutorials
    • Reviews
    • Blockchain Fundamentals
  • Research
    • Case Studies
  • Explore
    • DeFi
    • Crypto Gaming
    • NFT
    • DAO
    • Metaverses
    • Glossary
  • Jobs
  • Markets Pro
    • DeFi Planet Pro
    • Spend Crypto
    • Swap Crypto
    • Coin Prices
    • Crypto Exchanges
    • Crypto Analyzer
No Result
View All Result
DeFi Planet
No Result
View All Result
Home Articles

The White House Economic Report: A Critique of Biden’s Stance on Crypto

24 March 2023
in Articles, Opinion, Policy
Reading Time: 9 mins read
110 6
A-Critique-of-Biden's-Stance-on-Crypto

Contents

Toggle
  • Introduction
  • Claims vs Realities
  • Warnings from history – for banking or for crypto?
  • Regulatory clarity on the horizon?
  • Of fundamental and intrinsic value
  • In Conclusion

Introduction

If you believed that the hostile demeanour of the United States’ regulatory stance towards the cryptocurrency sector lacked backing from the government, President Joe Biden has taken steps to shatter that illusion.

On 21 March 2023, the White House published its Economic Report of the President (Report), which dedicated an entire chapter to crypto. Here’s the TL;DR summary: crypto is bad and has no intrinsic or fundamental value, but governments may be able to salvage some value from it in future via things like Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). The Report says that a U.S. CBDC “would have the potential to offer significant benefits.”

 

The Report, which is decidedly anti-crypto, sets out a series of what it calls “claims” in a section titled “The Perceived Appeal of Crypto Assets” – these are the potential benefits of crypto that the White House says are “often touted by their proponents .”It then goes on to offer a rebuttal of these claims with what it called the “The Reality of Crypto Assets.”

Below is a critique of the Biden White House’s lacklustre attitude to crypto and its seeming endorsement of the SEC’s flawed regulation-by-enforcement strategy.

Claims vs Realities

The White House sets out the following five statements as “Claims” made by the proponents of crypto: 

  • Crypto Assets Could Be Investment Vehicles
  • Cryptocurrencies Could Offer Money-like Functions without Relying on a Single Authority
  • Crypto Assets Could Enable Fast Digital Payments
  • Crypto Assets Could Increase Financial Inclusion
  • Crypto Assets Could Improve the United States’ Current Financial Technology Infrastructure

Evidently not buying these claims, the White House then purports to refute these claims with its own set of seven “Realities”:

  • Crypto Assets Are Mostly Speculative Investment Vehicles
  • Cryptocurrencies Generally Do Not Perform All the Functions of Money as Effectively as Sovereign Money, such as the U.S. Dollar
  • Stablecoins Can Be Subject to Run Risk
  • Crypto Assets Can Be Harmful to Consumers and Investors
  • There Have Been Limited Economic Benefits from DLT Technology
  • The Risks of Financial Innovation
  • Other Risks from Crypto Assets – leverage risks, price volatility, illicit finance risks, and ransomware uses

Warnings from history – for banking or for crypto?

Amid the continuing collapses of several traditional banks, including Silvergate Bank, Silicon Valley Bank, and Signature Bank, and the imminent possibility of a widespread banking catastrophe that has already necessitated government rescues – all following familiar and recurring patterns of fractional reserve banking leading to liquidity crunches – the Report seems to express a degree of conceit, and apparently without any sense of irony, that advocates of crypto “have been relearning the lessons from previous financial crises the hard way .”The chapter on crypto is even titled “Digital Assets: Relearning Economic Principles,” which underscores the message the U.S. Presidency is attempting to convey.

There is some real chastisement in the Report for proponents of decentralized digital assets, with historical lessons about the origins of money, as well as some reminders of “economic principles,” including by reference to the U.S. banking crisis of 1907 when a series of state-chartered banks suffered a run as customers rushed to withdraw their deposits.

Despite the current brewing banking crisis, and with a certain degree of narrow-mindedness, the Report presents the following statement without any apparent sense of irony:

“Innovation in financial services brings both risks and opportunities for the broader economy. It can challenge business models and existing industries, but it cannot challenge basic economic principles, such as what makes an asset effective as money and the incentives that give rise to run risk.”

Regulators and central banks often warn of the potential for unregulated crypto to spread risk to the regulated banking sector. However, the opposite has recently been observed, with contagion from the banking sector to crypto.

It is ironic that the “free market” economic theory’s inherent price of commercial failure has been evident in the crypto sector, where many firms have failed and tokens devalued or eradicated. The banking sector, on the other hand, is not subject to market forces, as bailouts and government rescues have become the norm.

Regulatory clarity on the horizon?

The United States has undoubtedly experienced regulatory turmoil regarding crypto. Crypto companies and startups are constantly on edge, fearing penalties for violating imaginary regulations. The Securities and Exchange Commission (U.S. SEC), which is responsible for regulating securities, has become proficient in “regulation-by-enforcement.” Despite the lack of a rulebook outlining the requirements that these companies allegedly violated, the U.S. SEC has launched numerous enforcement actions and imposed billions of dollars in fines on digital asset firms, e.g., Nexo and BlockFi.

Contrary to the normal operation of the rule of law, the U.S. SEC has unilaterally expanded the scope of its own authority and jurisdiction and has done so without setting out a rulebook for crypto. So far, it seems to identify its target firms and individuals randomly and then seeks to punish them for falling foul of the SEC’s (private, unpublished) interpretation of a 1946 U.S. Supreme Court case (SEC v. W.J. Howey Co.) about an investment contract involving a sale and leaseback of citrus groves. Many experts and commentators have already put forth arguments on why cryptos are not securities.  

In any case, whether or not a crypto is a security is the wrong question. It is a self-serving question that has relevance only because securities are what the U.S. SEC has jurisdiction over. Cryptos are clearly not securities, but that doesn’t mean some crypto-related activities should not be regulated: they should be. But, first, you make the rules; next, you supervise; then, you enforce. The U.K. government’s recent proposals for crypto regulation are an example of how this can be done.

“First, you make the rules; next, you supervise; then, you enforce.”  

A better approach is to create a new class of regulated activities based on crypto. It is patently unfair and counter-productive to enforce ad hoc against non-existent rules. Even one of its own commissioners, the fiercely independent-minded Hester Peirce, has often spoken against the U.S. SEC’s approach, arguing instead for rulemaking to provide regulatory clarity.

Despite the increasing regulatory chaos surrounding digital assets, the U.S. SEC and its current chairman, Gary Gensler, have persisted with their approach of regulation-by-enforcement instead of rulemaking. While many are looking to the U.S. government and Congress to step in and provide much-needed clarity, the White House seems unconcerned and unlikely to propose any useful legislation. The Biden administration appears satisfied with the current state of affairs, believing that the U.S. SEC and other agencies are doing an adequate job.

The Economic Report of the President confidently asserts that:

“Much of the activity in the crypto asset space is covered by existing regulations and regulators are expanding their capabilities to bring a large number of new entities under compliance. Other parts of the crypto asset space require coordination by various agencies and deliberations about how to address the risks they pose.”

Thus, it appears that the White House is endorsing the U.S. SEC in its regulatory power grab and enforcement-centric approach to policymaking. Therefore, we should anticipate further upheaval in this space. 

Of fundamental and intrinsic value

The Report states on several occasions that crypto has no intrinsic or fundamental value and went as far as to say that even commodities such as gold and silver have fundamental values given their usage in jewellery and manufacturing. 

The Report concludes on crypto:

“Indeed, crypto assets to date do not appear to offer investments with any fundamental value, nor do they act as an effective alternative to fiat money, improve financial inclusion, or make payments more efficient; instead, their innovation has been mostly about creating artificial scarcity in order to support crypto assets’ prices—and many of them have no fundamental value.”

This conclusion is shared by others around the world, including, for example, the Bank for International Settlements, and Britain’s central bank, the Bank of England. Typically, the implication offered is that fiat currencies and traditional financial assets such as shares and bonds have fundamental or intrinsic value. It is, therefore, surprising that the Report also states that:

“sovereign money does not have a fundamental or intrinsic value”

An astonishing admission in a document that uses the same argument as a demerit of crypto and digital assets in general. But to be fair, the Report does add an important qualification: 

“Even so, sovereign money can easily satisfy money’s requirements…The main reason for this is that the value of sovereign money is backed by a trusted institution—the central bank.”

It argues that crypto is ineffective in serving the three functions of money (i.e., unit of account, medium of exchange, and store of value). On this, the Report concludes that:

“Although cryptocurrencies currently serve each of these functions, they only do so in limited ways in the United States, so they do not serve, from an economic perspective, as an effective alternative to the U.S. dollar.”

The recurring emphasis on money and its operations, along with the U.S. dollar’s perceived superior capacity to serve as a functional currency (in contrast to crypto), indicates either a justifiable protectiveness from a government that wants to thwart potential threats to its money supply monopoly, or an impulsive, superficial, and incomplete comprehension of crypto as a technology or an Internet-based framework for trustless value creation and exchange.

In Conclusion

  • President Biden’s administration regards crypto as a speculative asset lacking intrinsic value, but it appears open to utilizing the underlying technology to establish a government-controlled digital currency, i.e., a CBDC.
  • Unless the U.S. Congress intervenes positively, it is evident that the future of a thriving and ground-breaking U.S. crypto industry will face turbulence.
  • The disorderly approach of regulatory measures towards this emerging technology seems likely to persist, leaving the courts as the ultimate safeguard for companies and individuals impacted by it.
  • Establishing a presence in the U.S. or catering to American customers or users is a decision that crypto companies and protocols will need to consider carefully.

 

If you would like to read more articles like this, visit DeFi Planet and follow us on Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram and CoinMarketCap Community.

Take control of your crypto portfolio with MARKETS PRO, DeFi Planet’s suite of analytics tools.

Don't miss out!

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Receive top education news, lesson ideas, teaching tips and more!
Invalid email address
Give it a try. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Thanks for subscribing!
Tags: BidenWhite House
Share67Tweet42Share12
Olu Omoyele

Olu Omoyele

Olu is a banking regulatory specialist who is excited by the promise of Web3 technologies for decentralized governance, operational efficiency, and trustless human interaction.

Related Posts

Beyond Bitcoin: Why Ethereum Deserves a Bigger Slice of Institutional Portfolios
Opinion

Beyond Bitcoin: Why Ethereum Deserves a Bigger Slice of Institutional Portfolios

23 July 2025
What is the Real Potential of the Open Network (TON)?
Project Reviews

What is the Real Potential of the Open Network (TON)?

23 July 2025
Is Browser-Based Crypto Mining Still Profitable in 2025?
Explainers

Is Browser-Based Crypto Mining Still Profitable in 2025?

23 July 2025
If Crypto Were Just Hype, It Would’ve Died Years Ago
Opinion

If Crypto Were Just Hype, It Would’ve Died Years Ago

23 July 2025

Featured Posts

What is a Crypto Order Book and How Does it Work?

What is a Crypto Order Book and How Does it Work?

byOlayinka Sodiq
14 July 2025
0

Elon Musk's xAI Colossus: What It Is and Why It’s a Big Deal?

Elon Musk’s xAI Colossus: What It Is and Why It’s a Big Deal?

byOlayinka Sodiqand1 others
12 July 2025
0

Is AI the Future of Crypto Trading or a Threat to Market Stability?

Is AI the Future of Crypto Trading or a Threat to Market Stability?

byOlajumoke Oyaleke
7 July 2025
0

What Are DeFi Options Vaults, and How Do They Work?

What Are DeFi Options Vaults, and How Do They Work?

byOlajumoke Oyaleke
26 June 2025
0

source: investorplace.com

How to Find the Newest Cryptocurrencies Before They’re Listed

byOlayinka Sodiq
30 December 2024
0

Read More

Chain of Thoughts

The Game-changing Triumvirate: Blockchain, Data Science, and Artificial Intelligence

The Game-changing Triumvirate: Blockchain, Data Science, and Artificial Intelligence

byOlu Omoyele
30 June 2025
0

...

Are Stablecoins Bank Deposits?

Are Stablecoins Bank Deposits?

byOlu Omoyele
31 May 2025
0

...

DAOs and the Coordination of Human Endeavour

DAOs and The Coordination of Human Endeavour

byOlu Omoyele
27 April 2025
0

...

Should DeFi Be Regulated?

Should DeFi Be Regulated?

byOlu Omoyele
27 March 2025
0

...

Markets Update

Your Weekend Crypto Roundup | July 2025 (Week 3)

6 days ago

Account Abstraction Adoption: Are Users Ready for Smart Wallets?

1 week ago

The Role of Real-World Assets (RWAs) in the Next DeFi Boom

1 week ago

Stablecoins in 2025: Still Depegging or Finally Stable?

1 week ago

Your Weekend Crypto Roundup | July 2025 (Week 2)

2 weeks ago

The Battle for Web3 Infrastructure: Which Platforms are Dominating in Decentralized Storage, Compute, and Identity?

2 weeks ago
Read More

Events

Rare Evo 2025
Rare Evo 2025
6 Aug 25
Las Vegas
CBDC Conference
CBDC Conference
9 Sep 25
Nassau

Spotlight

All about Ethereum
All about Algorand
All about Bitcoin
All about Gora

Press Releases

Ethereum Based Meme Coin PEPETO Surpasses $5.5M in Presale

bychainwire
23 July 2025
0

Crypto MEV Bot (Cryptomevbot.com) Launches Crypto Trading Bot for Individual and Enterprise Traders

bychainwire
23 July 2025
0

MultiBank.io Partners with Fireblocks and Mavryk to Launch $10B Real Estate Tokenization Platform

bychainwire
23 July 2025
0

Cango Inc. Announces Completion of Secondary Acquisition and Appointment of New Leadership Team

bychainwire
23 July 2025
0

Bybit DeFi Report: RWA and DEXs Thrive Despite Cooling Market Activity

bychainwire
23 July 2025
0

Read More

ADVERTISING

ABOUT

TEAM

CAREERS

CONTACT

TERMS & CONDITIONS

PRIVACY POLICY

© Copyright 2025 DeFi Planet

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
Please enter and activate your license key for Cryptocurrency Widgets PRO plugin for unrestricted and full access of all premium features.

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • People
    • Business
    • Crime
    • Regulation
    • Crypto
    • CBDC
  • Markets
    • Bitcoin
    • Ethereum
    • Stablecoins
    • Altcoins
    • Crypto ETFs
    • Memecoins
  • Policy
  • Articles
    • Press Releases
    • Opinion
    • Explainers
    • Guest Post
    • Sponsored
  • Directory
    • Companies
    • People
    • Products
    • Wallets
  • Multimedia
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
  • Learn
    • DeFi Basics
    • Tutorials
    • Reviews
    • Blockchain Fundamentals
  • Research
    • Case Studies
  • Explore
    • DeFi
    • Crypto Gaming
    • NFT
    • DAO
    • Metaverses
    • Glossary
  • Jobs
  • Markets Pro
    • DeFi Planet Pro
    • Spend Crypto
    • Swap Crypto
    • Coin Prices
    • Crypto Exchanges
    • Crypto Analyzer

© Copyright 2024 DeFi Planet   |   Terms & Conditions   |   Privacy Policy

-
00:00
00:00

Queue

Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00